Fraud investigation redaction is the removal of personal data from a counter-fraud file. Insurance Act 2015 s.12 sets the remedies for a fraudulent claim: the insurer is not liable for it, may recover sums already paid, and may treat the contract as terminated from the fraudulent act. Counter-fraud processing relies on the condition for preventing fraud in DPA 2018 Schedule 1, Part 2, para. 14. anonym.plus marks each item on your device.
When this applies
A counter-fraud file gathers a subject's records, surveillance notes, and witness contacts. Counsel needs the evidence chain; a vendor or a model does not need the names. You trim those fields before the dossier moves, while the evidential original stays unaltered.
How anonym.plus handles it
- Open the file in anonym.plus on your device.
- Local OCR reads scanned reports and statements.
- The tool flags subject and witness identifiers.
- Keep the case codes and findings intact.
- Swap or black out the confirmed entries.
- Save the clean copy locally.
What you need to provide
- The investigation file (PDF, DOCX, or scan).
- An operator (Redact suits sensitive evidence).
- Optional alias map for repeat subjects.
PII & financial identifiers detected
| Category | anonym.plus entity type | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Names | PERSON | subject Mercer → [SUBJECT] |
| Names | PERSON | witness named → [WITNESS] |
| Identifiers | UK_NINO | MR 07 05 11 C → [NINO] |
| Financial | UK_BANK_NUMBER | acct 4412 → [ACCOUNT] |
| Contact | PHONE_NUMBER | +44 20 7946 0147 → [PHONE] |
| Location | LOCATION | home address → [ADDRESS] |
Compliance achieved
- Keeps the evidence chain whole for the remedies in Insurance Act 2015 s.12 — no liability for a fraudulent claim, recovery of sums paid, and termination from the fraudulent act.
- Preserves the material behind a fundamental-dishonesty application under Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015 s.57, which lets a court dismiss the whole personal-injury claim.
- Counter-fraud work relies on the condition for preventing fraud in DPA 2018 Schedule 1, Part 2, para. 14; the crime exemption in Schedule 2, Part 1, para. 2 can restrict subject rights where compliance would prejudice the investigation.
- Flags witnesses and informants, not just the subject. Everything stays offline.
Anonymise fraud investigation files offline — see plans & start free →
Limitations & cautions
Surveillance notes can re-identify a subject through a unique routine. The tool flags named items, not every behavioural clue, and redaction never replaces keeping the evidential original unaltered. Read the notes before you share the file.
Frequently asked questions
What can an insurer do about a fraudulent claim?
Insurance Act 2015 s.12 sets the remedies: no liability for the fraudulent claim, recovery of anything already paid on it, and the option to treat the contract as terminated from the fraudulent act. This page is information, not legal advice.
Should I redact informants and witnesses?
Often yes. Their contacts are personal data too, and exposure is what stops people coming forward. anonym.plus flags the subject and the others for review.
Does redacting affect a subject access request?
Possibly. DPA 2018 Schedule 2, Part 1, para. 2 lets you restrict rights where compliance would prejudice the prevention or detection of crime. Apply that exemption on the facts of the case, and record why.