Independent Monitor Report Redaction with anonym.plus

Clear personal data from the report while the findings stay readable.

In simple terms, PII redaction is the on-device process of finding and masking personally identifiable information in a document before it is shared.

Monitor report redaction is the removal of personal data from an independent reviewer's findings. In UK financial regulation this is often a skilled person's report the FCA or PRA has required under FSMA 2000 s.166 — commissioned and paid for by the firm, but appointed to report on a specified aspect of the business back to the regulator. anonym.plus runs locally and keeps the findings and recommendations whole.

When this applies

A skilled person appointed under FSMA 2000 s.166, or another independent reviewer, reports on a company's remediation and names many staff. To circulate the findings internally, you clear those names but keep the assessment.

How anonym.plus handles it

  1. Load the file into anonym.plus on your device.
  2. The tool flags staff, reviewer, and contact names.
  3. Findings and recommendations stay untouched.
  4. Swap or black out the confirmed names.
  5. Save the clean copy on your device.

What you need to provide

PII entity types detected

Categoryanonym.plus entity typeExample
NamesPERSONnamed staff → [EMPLOYEE_1]
NamesPERSONthe reviewer → [MONITOR]
ContactEMAIL_ADDRESScontact email → [EMAIL]
DatesDATE_TIMEreviewed 14 Mar → [DATE]
LocationLOCATIONsite visited → [SITE]
IdentifiersUK_NINOstaff no. → [ID]

Compliance achieved

Anonymise monitor reports offline — see plans & start free →

Limitations & cautions

A named staffer can be obvious from a unique role even with the name gone. Weigh this before wide release. The tool removes named people; it cannot judge when a title alone re-identifies.

Frequently asked questions

What is a skilled person report?

Under FSMA 2000 s.166, the FCA or PRA can require a firm to commission an independent report from a skilled person on a specified aspect of its business, and it is the firm, not the regulator, that pays for it.

Is the report safe to circulate internally after this?

In de-identified form, yes for wider internal use — but the version that goes to the regulator under s.166 is a separate, unredacted document; anonymisation here is about internal circulation, not the regulatory submission itself.

Can I keep one person consistent throughout it?

Yes. A label map maps the same person to one alias throughout the file.