Settlement redaction is the removal of party PII from a release. Where the release settles an employment claim, ERA 1996 s.203(3) sets conditions: it must be in writing, cover the particular complaint, and identify the independent adviser who advised the employee. That adviser's name is a required particular of the signed original, not an optional detail. So you redact the shared copy and never the executed one.
When this applies
A settlement names the parties, the sum, the bank account, and often a named solicitor. ERA 1996 s.43J voids any wording that would stop a protected disclosure, so the confidentiality clause has limits worth reading. To circulate the document as a precedent, you clear the identifiers and keep the drafting.
How anonym.plus handles it
- Load the file into anonym.plus on your device.
- The tool flags each party and signatory.
- It catches the payout sum and bank fields.
- Confirm the flags and keep the release text.
- Swap or black out the IDs.
- Save the clean file on your machine.
What you need to provide
- The signed document (PDF, DOCX, or scan).
- An operator; Replace keeps the terms readable.
- Optional role map for [CLAIMANT] / [RESPONDENT] labels.
PII entity types detected
| Category | anonym.plus entity type | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Names | PERSON | claimant → [CLAIMANT] |
| Names | PERSON | respondent → [RESPONDENT] |
| Pay | MONEY | payout sum → [AMOUNT] |
| Banking | IBAN_CODE | payee acct → [IBAN] |
| Contact | EMAIL_ADDRESS | solicitor email → [EMAIL] |
| Dates | DATE_TIME | signing date → [DATE] |
Compliance achieved
- Keeps the executed original whole, since ERA 1996 s.203(3) requires the independent adviser to be identified in it.
- Leaves confidentiality wording readable, subject to ERA 1996 s.43J, which voids any clause blocking a protected disclosure.
- Flags the payout figure, which combined with a date can identify the parties.
- Local work preserves the document's confidentiality clause.
- Offline work keeps the file inside your firm.
Anonymise settlement releases offline — see plans & start free →
Limitations & cautions
Many such documents are themselves confidential. A unique sum plus a date can hint at the parties after names go. Broaden the figure and date where the use allows, and keep no re-link key for true anonymity.
Frequently asked questions
Why is the adviser named in a settlement agreement?
ERA 1996 s.203(3) makes an employment settlement binding only if conditions are met, including that the employee had advice from a relevant independent adviser and that the agreement identifies that adviser. The name is therefore part of what makes the original effective. Redact the copy you share, not the signed document.
Does a confidentiality clause stop a whistleblower?
No. ERA 1996 s.43J voids any provision in an agreement in so far as it purports to stop a worker making a protected disclosure. The rest of the confidentiality wording still stands, which is why the drafting is worth keeping in a precedent.
Is the payout sum removed?
Yes, when tied to named parties, because a distinctive sum plus a date can identify them. The figure is flagged for removal or broadening while the release and waiver language stays.