Appeal Skeleton Redaction with anonym.plus

Clear personal identifiers from the written argument before you lodge it on appeal.

In simple terms, PII redaction is the on-device process of finding and masking personally identifiable information in a document before it is shared.

Appeal-skeleton redaction is the removal of personal data from the written argument and papers lodged under CPR PD 52C, the practice direction that governs appeals to the Court of Appeal. anonym.plus marks each identifier on your device, so the argument stays whole while the data goes.

When this applies

An appellate challenge recycles the material from below. Rule 52.21(1) limits it to a review of the lower court's decision, so the identifiers in the trial papers travel upward with the compilation. Permission itself turns on the test in rule 52.6(1): a real prospect of success, or some other compelling reason for the case to be heard.

How anonym.plus handles it

  1. Load the argument and its papers into anonym.plus on your device.
  2. The tool scans the text, the references, and each attached page.
  3. It flags NI numbers, account numbers, birth dates, and children.
  4. Keep authorities and page references intact.
  5. Swap or black out the confirmed identifiers.
  6. Save the clean copy locally.

What you need to provide

PII entity types detected

Categoryanonym.plus entity typeExample
IdentifiersUK_NINOQQ 60 22 44 A → [NINO]
NamesPERSONAppellant Reyes → [PARTY]
DatesDATE_TIMEDOB 1990 → [DOB]
FinancialUK_BANK_NUMBERacct 7782 → [ACCOUNT]
MinorPERSONJ.R., a minor → [MINOR]
LocationLOCATIONtrial venue → [ADDRESS]

Compliance achieved

Anonymise appeal skeletons offline — see plans & start free →

Limitations & cautions

Quotes from the evidence carry the lower court's identifiers. CPR PD 52C also sets filing deadlines the tool knows nothing about. Read the quoted passages and check the timetable before you lodge.

Frequently asked questions

Which rules govern a skeleton lodged on appeal?

CPR PD 52C sets out the procedure for appeals to the Court of Appeal, including the skeleton and the papers lodged with it. Rule 52.21(1) limits the hearing to a review of the decision below, so the same material, and the same identifiers, come up with it.

Do the lodged papers get scanned too?

Yes. The tool scans the argument and every page lodged with it, with OCR for any scanned exhibit, so an identifier buried in a trial page is flagged like any other.

Is the skeleton uploaded for processing?

No. The app runs locally, so the document and its work-product stay on your machine.