Self-Assessment Redaction with anonym.plus

Hide the author before a self-review feeds a fairness study.

Self-assessment redaction is the removal of identifiers from a review a person writes about their own work, so the writer stays private. GDPR Recital 26 puts anonymous data beyond the rules. anonym.plus marks each name on your device, so the reflections stay useful while the person is hidden.

When this applies

A team studies how staff rate their own work. You redact the writer first, so each entry meets Recital 26 before the comparison runs.

How anonym.plus handles it

  1. Open the review in anonym.plus on your device.
  2. Local OCR reads a scanned response form.
  3. The tool flags the writer and named peers.
  4. Confirm the flags and keep the rating scale.
  5. Replace each name with a neutral label.
  6. Save the clean entry locally.

What you need to provide

PII entity types detected

Categoryanonym.plus entity typeExample
NamesPERSON“I, Karl, met…” → [WRITER]
NamesPERSONthanks to Mei → [PEER]
ContactEMAIL_ADDRESSkarl@firm.com → [EMAIL]
DatesDATE_TIMEperiod 2025 → [PERIOD]
OrgORGANIZATIONOps Team → [TEAM]
LocationLOCATIONZurich site → [SITE]

Compliance achieved

Anonymize self-assessments offline — see plans & start free →

Limitations & cautions

Such a review is rich free text, so it is hard to anonymise. A unique project or a distinct voice can reveal who wrote it after the name goes. Read each entry before you share it.

Frequently asked questions

Why is a self-review hard to anonymise?

It is personal free text. A unique achievement or a distinct writing style can identify who wrote it after names go, which Recital 26 treats as non-anonymous.

Does it hide peers the writer names?

Yes. It flags the writer and any colleagues mentioned, so you can mask each one.

Is the entry uploaded?

No. The app is fully offline, so it stays on your device.