Competency Assessment Redaction with anonym.plus

Hide the named staff before assessment data feeds a skills study.

In simple terms, PII redaction is the on-device process of finding and masking personally identifiable information in a document before it is shared.

Competency assessment redaction is the removal of identifiers from skill-rating sheets so no one is named. A standard test applied to everyone is a provision, criterion or practice, so Equality Act 2010 section 19 asks whether it disadvantages a group and section 20 asks what adjustment a disabled candidate needed. anonym.plus marks each name on your device, so the competency scores stay clear while the staff stay private.

When this applies

A learning team maps competency gaps across a department, and one assessment was sat without the adjustment a dyslexic worker had asked for. You redact the names first, so the gap analysis is about the skill and the process, not the person.

How anonym.plus handles it

  1. Open the rating sheet in anonym.plus on your device.
  2. Built-in OCR reads a scanned assessment form.
  3. The app marks names and emails.
  4. Confirm the markings and keep the skill levels.
  5. Swap each name for a steady code.
  6. Save the cleaned sheet locally.

What you need to provide

PII entity types detected

Categoryanonym.plus entity typeExample
NamesPERSONEva Lund → RATEE_8
ContactEMAIL_ADDRESSe.lund@example.co.uk → [EMAIL]
OrgORGANIZATIONData Team → [TEAM]
DatesDATE_TIMEassessed 2025 → [DATE]
LocationLOCATIONSheffield site → [SITE]
DemographicNRPapprentice group → [GROUP]

Compliance achieved

Anonymise competency assessments offline — see plans & start free →

Limitations & cautions

A rare skill profile can single out one person even with no name. If only one staffer holds a niche rating, the row identifies them. Aggregate rare profiles before sharing.

Frequently asked questions

Can a rare skill profile identify someone?

Yes. A unique combination of ratings may belong to one person, which Recital 26 treats as non-anonymous. Aggregate rare profiles.

Can a standard competency test be discriminatory?

It can. Section 19 of the Equality Act 2010 covers a provision, criterion or practice that puts a protected group at a disadvantage unless it is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim. A timed written test is a common example.

Does it keep the skill levels?

Yes. Only names and contacts are coded, so the competency scores stay intact for analysis.

Is the sheet uploaded?

No. The app is fully offline, so it stays on your device.