Promotion Record Redaction with anonym.plus

Blind a promotion file so the decision turns on merit, not identity.

Promotion record redaction is the removal of names and identity cues from advancement files before they are reviewed. The Equality Act 2010 discourages promotion decisions tied to its nine protected characteristics. anonym.plus masks each identifier on your device, so a panel weighs the case on merit alone.

When this applies

A committee audits past promotion calls for fairness. You blind the files first, so reviewers cannot see characteristics the Equality Act 2010 treats as protected.

How anonym.plus handles it

  1. Open the advancement file in anonym.plus on your device.
  2. Built-in OCR reads a scanned decision memo.
  3. The app marks names and characteristic-linked terms.
  4. Confirm the markings and keep the criteria scores.
  5. Mask each name with a stable code.
  6. Save the blinded file locally.

What you need to provide

PII entity types detected

Categoryanonym.plus entity typeExample
NamesPERSONOmar Aziz → STAFF_04
DemographicNRPrace or origin → [REDACTED]
DatesDATE_TIMEDOB 1978 → [AGE-BAND]
LocationLOCATIONhome postcode → [AREA]
ContactEMAIL_ADDRESSo.aziz@example.co.uk → [EMAIL]
OrgORGANIZATIONFaith network → [GROUP]

Compliance achieved

Anonymise promotion records offline — see plans & start free →

Limitations & cautions

Blinding cannot undo bias baked into past scores. If a prior rating already reflected a protected characteristic, masking the name will not fix it. Audit the underlying criteria too.

Frequently asked questions

How does redaction support a fair audit?

It lets reviewers judge the case without seeing protected characteristics, which the Equality Act 2010 guards. It is one control among several.

Does it catch age and origin cues?

Yes. It marks birth dates, origin terms, and network names so you can mask them before review.

Is the file uploaded anywhere?

No. The app is fully offline, so the record stays on your device.